Anyway, this interesting little lens came to me somewhat by accident this week. I got it for quite a good price as it included the center filter to go with it. It's a lot smaller than I expected. Looking towards the future though I really don't know how long 4x5 film will be available, and so a good 2x3 "technical" camera may be in my future so this will also be a good investment for that.
The other interesting thing is, rumor has it this little fella can just about cover 4x5, with maybe a few millimeters at the edge missing. However I couldn't find more than 1 or 2 images on the internet from a 4x5, just claims that it kinda-sorta-maybe covered close enough. More importantly though, it definitely covers 6x12 just fine which is pretty awesome. I like the 6x12 aspect ratio sometimes but even better, I can pop 35mm in the back with some adapter things and shoot super panoramas.
Anyway, I got some fresh air today and went to Reed Bingham in the late afternoon. I shot a half-dozen sheets of film and a couple rolls of 35mm. It wasn't the greatest outing but I took a couple photos showing the boardwalk. Here's the "super-panorama" of the boardwalk, taken on Plus-X and developed in Microdol-X:
That's pretty wide! Of course you get the sprockets here but you can crop them out if you like. The image comes out to be about 34mm by 112mm, or a bit more than 1:3. So it's like a mini 6x17 camera except with sprockets. If you crop those out to the standard 24mm height of 35mm film, it's just shy of a whopping 1:5 ratio! It's basically a Hasselblad X-Pan on steroids (that camera shoots 24x65). The caveat here is you can't focus quickly, but I did rig up a flash bracket as well as a viewfinder and bubble level for my Chamonix, so at f/16 or so I can just hyperfocal focus and shoot the whole roll without focusing. I used a 12mm viewfinder from my Voigtlander M-Mount lens for this and guessed the slightly different width.
As for the full sheet of 4x5, yes the corners vignetted, even at f/22. I don't think stopping down more would help but I'll try that next time. The question I have is whether the slight crop from this lens is wider than a 47mm XL lens. I'll have to shoot it and find out. The other thing I discovered is that the center filter is a must!
Here is one other shot of the boardwalk with the slightly cropped 4x5:
Even if the cropped shot isn't really wider than the 47XL, it's still worthwhile to me in a kit designed for 2x3. Of course on that format I can do all kinds of camera movements with all this coverage.
Here's one more photo, this time cropped to square. I like square format occasionally and this could be a good way to eliminate the vignetted corners. For reference, if I took this with a Hasselblad or other 6x6 camera, I would have to use a 23mm lens to get the same field of view!
Here's one more photo, this time cropped to square. I like square format occasionally and this could be a good way to eliminate the vignetted corners. For reference, if I took this with a Hasselblad or other 6x6 camera, I would have to use a 23mm lens to get the same field of view!
Anyway, I am looking forward to shooting this lens more often, especially with the super-panoramas. I have some film specifically to do this with - unperforated Portra 160NC.
No comments:
Post a Comment